ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the basic characteristics of various types of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and the predictive value of six common disease severity scores in critically ill patients on the first day on the 28-day death risk.Methods:The general information, disease severity scores [acute physiology score Ⅲ (APSⅢ), Oxford acute disease severity (OASIS) score, Logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ (SAPSⅡ), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score], prognosis and other indicators of critically ill patients admitted from 2008 to 2019 were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ 2.0 (MIMIC-Ⅳ 2.0). The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) of six critical illness scores for 28-day death risk of patients in various ICU, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated, the optimal Youden index was used to determine the cut-off value, and the AUC of various ICU was verified by Delong method.Results:A total of 53 150 critically ill patients were enrolled, with medical ICU (MICU) accounted for the most (19.25%, n = 10 233), followed by cardiac vascular ICU (CVICU) with 17.78% ( n = 9 450), and neurological ICU (NICU) accounted for the least (6.25%, n = 3 320). The patients in coronary care unit (CCU) were the oldest [years old: 71.79 (60.27, 82.33)]. The length of ICU stay in NICU was the longest [days: 2.84 (1.51, 5.49)] and accounted for the highest proportion of total length of hospital stay [63.51% (34.61%, 97.07%)]. The patients in comprehensive ICU had the shortest length of ICU stay [days: 1.75 (0.99, 3.05)]. The patients in CVICU had the lowest proportion of length of ICU stay to total length of hospital stay [27.69% (18.68%, 45.18%)]. The six scores within the first day of ICU admission in NICU patients were lower than those in the other ICU, while APSⅢ, LODS, OASIS, and SOFA scores in MICU patients were higher than those in the other ICU. SAPⅡ and SIRS scores were both the highest in CVICU, respectively. In terms of prognosis, MICU patients had the highest 28-day mortality (14.14%, 1 447/10 233), while CVICU patients had the lowest (2.88%, 272/9 450). ROC curve analysis of the predictive value of each score on the 28-day death risk of various ICU patients showed that, the predictive value of APSⅢ, LODS, and SAPSⅡ in comprehensive ICU were higher [AUC and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were 0.84 (0.83-0.85), 0.82 (0.81-0.84), and 0.83 (0.82-0.84), respectively]. The predictive value of OASIS, LODS, and SAPSⅡ in surgical ICU (SICU) were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.80 (0.79-0.82), 0.79 (0.78-0.81), and 0.79 (0.77-0.80), respectively]. The predictive value of APSⅢ and SAPSⅡ in MICU were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.84 (0.82-0.85) and 0.82 (0.81-0.83), respectively]. The predictive value of APSⅢ and SAPSⅡ in CCU were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.86 (0.85-0.88) and 0.85 (0.83-0.86), respectively]. The predictive value of LODS and SAPSⅡ in trauma ICU (TICU) were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.83 (0.82-0.83) and 0.83 (0.82-0.84), respectively]. The predictive value of OASIS and SAPSⅡ in NICU were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.83 (0.80-0.85) and 0.81 (0.78-0.83), respectively]. The predictive value of APSⅢ, LODS, and SAPSⅡ in CVICU were higher [AUC and 95% CI were 0.84 (0.83-0.85), 0.81 (0.80-0.82), and 0.78 (0.77-0.78), respectively]. Conclusions:For the patients in comprehensive ICU, MICU, CCU, and CVICU, APSⅢ or SAPSⅡ can be applied for predicting 28-day death risk. For the patients in SICU and NICU, OASIS or SAPSⅡ can be applied to predict 28-day death risk. For the patients in TICU, SAPSⅡ or LODS can be applied for predicting 28-day death risk. For CVICU patients, APSⅢ or LODS can be applied to predict 28-day death risk.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar como a funcionalidade e a disfunção orgânica aguda influenciam a mortalidade hospitalar de pacientes oncológicos admitidos com suspeita de sepse. Métodos: Os dados foram obtidos de uma coorte retrospectiva de pacientes oncológicos com suspeita de infecção admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. Estes receberam antibióticos por via parenteral e tiveram suas culturas coletadas. Utilizamos uma regressão logística, para avaliar a mortalidade hospitalar como desfecho, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment e Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group como preditores, além de suas interações. Resultados: Dentre os 450 pacientes incluídos, 265 (58,9%) morreram no hospital. Para os pacientes admitidos na unidade de terapia intensiva com Sequential Organ Failure Assessment baixo (≤ 6), o comprometimento da funcionalidade influenciou a mortalidade hospitalar, que foi de 32% entre os pacientes sem comprometimento ou com comprometimento mínimo da funcionalidade e 52% entre os pacientes com comprometimento moderado e grave (p < 0,01). Nos pacientes com Sequential Organ Failure Assessment elevado (> 6), a funcionalidade não influenciou a mortalidade hospitalar (73% entre os pacientes sem comprometimento ou com comprometimento mínimo, e 84% entre os pacientes com comprometimento moderado e grave; p = 0,1). Conclusão: O comprometimento da funcionalidade parece influenciar a mortalidade hospitalar de pacientes oncológicos com suspeita de sepse sem disfunções orgânicas agudas ou que apresentem disfunções leves no momento da admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva.
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate how performance status impairment and acute organ dysfunction influence hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cancer who were admitted with suspected sepsis. Methods: Data were obtained from a retrospective cohort of patients, admitted to an intensive care unit, with cancer and with a suspected infection who received parenteral antibiotics and underwent the collection of bodily fluid samples. We used logistic regression with hospital mortality as the outcome and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and their interactions as predictors. Results: Of 450 patients included, 265 (58.9%) died in the hospital. For patients admitted to the intensive care unit with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (≤ 6), performance status impairment influenced the in-hospital mortality, which was 32% among those with no and minor performance status impairment and 52% among those with moderate and severe performance status impairment, p < 0.01. However, for those with higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (> 6), performance status impairment did not influence the in-hospital mortality (73% among those with no and minor impairment and 84% among those with moderate and severe impairment; p = 0.1). Conclusion: Performance status impairment seems to influence hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients with suspected sepsis when they have less severe acute organ dysfunction at the time of intensive care unit admission.
Subject(s)
Humans , Critical Illness , Neoplasms/complications , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Hospital Mortality , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Intensive Care Units , Multiple Organ FailureABSTRACT
La sepsis es una de las principales causas de mortalidad en adultos y en niños. El impacto es negativo en la salud de la población, y los gastos generados en el sistema de salud se los calcula en varios miles de millones de dólares. La muerte infantil a nivel mundial representa por décadas una compleja y progresiva enfermedad inflamatoria secundaria a un agente infeccioso, la cual origina disoxia tisular y eventualmente falla celular y orgánica, sin necesariamente pasar por hipotensión en etapas tempranas sino en etapas tardías de enfermedad. En la presente publicación se actualiza las definiciones realizadas a partir del Tercer Consenso de Definiciones de Sepsis y Choque Séptico y las Campañas Internacionales Sobreviviendo a la Sepsis, tomando como referencia un mejor entendimiento de la patobiología de la enfermedad. Se aborda la necesidad de usar un puntaje de disfunción de órganos en niños para valorar y predecir la mortalidad de una mejor manera y realizar ensayos clínicos. El objetivo de este artículo es dar a conocer el estado actual del conocimiento en la parte operacional de definiciones y la sugerencia de adaptar los conceptos a las guías clínicas nacionales.
Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in adults and children. It has a negative impact on the population's health, and the expenses for the healthcare system are estimated at several billion dollars. Worldwide, infant death has represented for decades a complex and progressive inflammatory disease secondary to an infectious agent, which causes tissue dysoxia and eventually cell and organ failure, without necessarily going through hypotension in the early stages but in later stages of the disease. This review updates the definitions from the Third Consensus on Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock and the International Surviving Campaigns, which provide us a better understanding of the pathobiology of the disease. It elaborates on the need to use a score of organ dysfunction in children for better appraisal and prediction of mortality, and to conduct clinical trials. The objective of this article is to present the current status of knowledge of the operational definitions and to suggest the adaptation of the concepts in the national clinical guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Procalcitonin (PCT) is a newly introduced marker of systemic inflammation and bacterial infection. A marked increase in circulating PCT level in critically ill patients has been related with the severity of illness and poor survival. The goal of this study was to compare the prognostic power of PCT and three other parameters, the arterial ketone body ratio (AKBR), the acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score and the multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), in the differentiation between survivors and nonsurvivors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The study was performed in 95 patients over 16 years of age who met the criteria of SIRS. PCT and AKBR were assayed in arterial blood samples. The APACHE III score and MODS were recorded after the first 24 hours of surgical ICU (SICU) admission and then daily for two weeks or until either discharge or death. The patients were divided into two groups, survivors (n=71) and nonsurvivors (n=24), in accordance with the ICU outcome. They were also divided into three groups according to the trend of PCT level: declining, increasing or no change. Significant differences between survivors and nonsurvivors were found in APACHE III score and MODS throughout the study period, but in PCT value only up to the 7th day and in AKBR only up to the 3rd day. PCT values of the three groups were not significantly different on the first day between survivors and nonsurvivors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of mortality by PCT, AKBR, APACHE III score and MODS were 0.690, 0.320, 0.915 and 0.913, respectively, on the admission day. In conclusion, PCT could have some use as a mortality predictor in SIRS patients but was less reliable than APACHE III score or MODS.